home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.onramp.net!usenet
- From: dcorn@1.1.1.16 (David Corn)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: New Press Release!
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 01:19:32 GMT
- Organization: On-Ramp; Individual Internet Connections; Dallas/Ft Worth/Houston, TX USA
- Message-ID: <3148c53e.41910205@1.1.1.16>
- References: <19960308.7B72580.ED85@shadow.res.cmu.edu> <Do0JwK.6Eo@info.uucp> <4hsn6s$luc@uwm.edu> <4hv2oo$1s0@nyx.cs.du.edu> <philw-1003961936590001@philw.users.xplor.com>
- Reply-To: dcorn@paradise.pplnet.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: modem5.pplnet.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182
-
- On 11 Mar 1996 03:40:17 GMT, philw@xplor.com (P A Williamson) wrote:
-
- >I have absolutly no problem with putting my Amiga in a non-interlaced,
- >non-flickering display. It moves graphics around as fast as my Performa
- >(040 system vs. 040 system). All I did was put a graphics card inside.
- >Actually, my Performa is no jack rabbit in the graphics dept. :-)
-
- Performa 575 040/33 12/270 CD (with 14" monitor, CD, keyboard, 12M,
- 270M, etc) ---> $1000 or so; I sold mine a few months ago for $1030.
-
- Amiga graphics card, assuming CV64 - $500?
-
- Doesn't something seem a bit odd here? That CV64 should blow the
- living daylights off of the video in the Performa considering the
- video ALONE costs nearly half as much as a very, very complete
- Performa system.
-
-
-